2023 Supreme(SC) 426
M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Sharma – Respondent
Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Adv. Mr. Parinav Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Mansi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kumar Choudhary, Adv. Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Abhisth Kumar, AOR Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, AOR Mr. Omkar Jayant Deshpande, Adv. Mrs. Pradnya Shashibhushan Adgaonkar, Adv. Mr. Ajesh K Chawla, Adv. Ms. Saket Gautam, Adv. Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Sudhir Kulshreshtha, AOR Mr. S. R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prithvi Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Lomes, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, AOR Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, AOR Mr. Rajeev Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ayush Negi, Adv. Ms. Shashi Kiran, AOR Mr. Satish Chandra, Adv. Mr. Arjun Sain, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Bhalla, Adv. Mr. V.K. Shukla, Sr. Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, AOR Ms. Shreya Bhojnagarwala, Adv. Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, AOR Mrs. Anchal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, AOR Mr. Vivek Bansal, Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat, AOR Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Manju Bhagat, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gulati, Adv. Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, AOR Mr. Abhisek Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi, AOR Mr. Tejaswi Kumar Pradhan, AOR Mr. Manoranjan Paikaray, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Purushotham, Adv. Mr. Mohan Prasad Gupta, Adv. Mr. A. N. Arora, AOR Mr. Jatin Zaveri, AOR Mr. Ritesh Agrawal, AOR Mr. Tripurari Ray, Adv. Mr. Balwant Singh Billowria, Adv. Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Ray, Adv. Mr. Nithyananda Murthy P, Adv. Ms. Bhanu Prabha, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Singh, AOR Mr. S. S. Kulshrestha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajeet Pandey, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Rakesh Garg, Adv. Mr. A. G. Garg, Adv. Ms. Shweta Garg, AOR Mr. Kishan Chand Jain, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv. Mrs. Mithu Jain, Adv. Mr. Madhav Anand, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Jain, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Garga, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, AOR Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Ms. Harshita Raghuvansi, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Singh, AOR Ms. Priyanka Swami, Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar, AOR Mr. Himanshu Shekhar Tripathi, AOR Mr. T. N. Singh, AOR Mr. Vikas Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Rajshree Singh, Adv. Dr. Sham Chand, Adv. Mr. Vikram Singh, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Mr. Shantanu Sagar, AOR
JUDGMENT :
M.R. SHAH, J.
1. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of appeals, all these appeals are decided and disposed of together, by this common judgment and order.
2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad passed in the respective writ petitions, by which the High Court has quashed and set aside the various demand notices raised by the respective Development Authorities and the State of UP, the Development Authorities and the State of U.P. have preferred the present appeals.
2.1 Some of the appeals have been preferred by the original writ petitioners challenging the interim orders passed by the High Court in the respective writ petitions refusing to stay the demand notices, however, subject to the outcome of the proceedings pending before this Court which are being disposed of by this common judgment and order and directing the respective Development Authorities that in case the decision in the present proceedings is against the Development Authorities/State of U.P., they shall refund the amount of various fees collected with 6% interest per annum.
2.2 By the impugned judgme
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
