SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 430

M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
T. D. Vivek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ranbir Chaudhary – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, AOR

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Review Application No. 149-C/2016 in RSA No. 596/2012 and XOBJC 10C/2010, the original defendants have preferred the present appeals.

2. The facts leading to the present appeals are as under: -

2.1 That a “sale agreement” was entered into between appellant No. 1 as attorney of appellant No. 2 (original defendants) and the respondent herein (original plaintiff) for sale of the suit plot in question for a consideration of Rs. 17,61,700/-. The date for execution and registration of sale deed was tentatively fixed as 18.09.2004. A total amount of Rs. 2 lakh was paid as earnest money by the respondent. That thereafter, respondent – original plaintiff instituted the civil suit in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Faridabad, seeking specific performance of sale agreement and consequential relief of injunction. The suit was resisted by the appellants herein – original defendants on all grounds including the ground that even as per the agreement to sell and on failure of the defendants to execute the sale deed, t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top