KRISHNA MURARI, SANJAY KAROL
Yamal Manojbhai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Krishna Murari, J.)
1. The present writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises an issue of huge importance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, regarding the right of an accused under the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Customs Act’) to settle the dispute as per provisions contained under chapter XIV A of the Customs Act.
2. The writ petitioner, who is a Non-Resident Indian (for short, ‘NRI’), was arrested on 04.10.2022 at the Delhi International Airport. It is the case of the respondent that petitioner had tried to smuggle high value goods, mainly watches through the green channel entrance, in order to escape from paying duty on the same.
3. On suspicion of the petitioner trying to smuggle goods through customs, a detailed examination of the person and baggage of the petitioner was conducted, and it resulted in the recovery of seven wrist watches, along with a few other high value goods. Since the petitioner appeared to have committed offences under Sections 132 and 135 of the Customs act, he was arrested on 05.10.2022. After the arrest, the petitioner herein then filed the present writ petition
Additional Commissioner of Customs v. Ram Niwas Verma 2015 SCC Online Del 11542 Para 21 – Relied.
Commissioner of Customs v. Avinash Dawar & Anr. 2015 SCC Online Del 13875 Para 21 – Relied.
Commissioner of Customs v. Jyotsana Chikersal & Anr. 2019 SCC Online Del 6574 Para 21 – Relied.
Lilavati Bai v. State of Mysore AIR 1957 SC 521 Para 40 – Relied.
Additional Commissioner of Customs v. Ram Niwas Verma
Commissioner of Customs v. Jyotsna Chikersal and Anr.
Commissioner of Customs v. M. Ambalal
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court's jurisdiction in such cases is limited to examining the legality of the procedure followed by the Settlement Commission, not the va....
The court upheld the Settlement Commission's authority to impose interest on customs duties as permissible under statutory provisions, emphasizing that non-fulfillment of export obligations mandates ....
The court established that the provisions of the Customs Act do not guarantee an absolute right to cross-examine witnesses in adjudication proceedings, and the denial of such a right does not inheren....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the availability of a statutory remedy under the Customs Act and the failure of the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority despite the libe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.