S. RAVINDRA BHAT, DIPANKAR DATTA
Ramesh Chandra Vaishya – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content (inside
JUDGMENT :
DIPANKAR DATTA, J.
Leave granted.
2. The present appeal, by special leave, questions the judgment and order dated 23rd May, 2022 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (“High Court”, hereafter) dismissing an application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731[Application u/s 482 No. 38374 of 2018] (“Cr. PC”, hereafter) instituted by the appellant seeking quashing of the charge-sheet as well as the pending criminal proceedings2[Case Crime No. 23 of 2016; Criminal Case No. 376 of 2016].
3. In a nutshell, the prosecution's case is that on 14th January, 2016, at about 7.00 am, the appellant was engaged in an altercation with the second respondent (“complainant”, hereafter) over the issue of drainage of water. It is alleged that during this altercation, the appellant verbally hurled caste related abuses towards the complainant and his family members, and subsequently physically assaulted the complainant causing him multiple injuries. Consequently, on 20th January, 2016, a First Information Report (“first F.I.R”, hereafter) was registered against the appellant under sections 323 and 504, Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”, here
Hitesh Verma v. The State of Uttarakhand & Anr. (2020) 10 SCC 710 [Para 10] – Relied.
Mohd. Allauddin Khan v. The State of Bihar and Ors. (2019) 6 SCC 107 [Para 9] – Relied.
State of Haryana and Ors. v. Bhajan Lal and Ors. 1992 Supp1 SCC 335 [Para 10] – Relied. – Relied.
Fiona Shrikhande and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra (2013) 14 SCC 44 [Para 22] – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.