2023 Supreme(SC) 585
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
Trinity Infraventures Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M. S. Murthy – Respondent
Advocates appeared:
For the parties : Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR Mr. V N Murthy, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Sansanwal, Adv. Mr. Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mandeep Kalra, AOR Ms. Radhika Narula, Adv. Ms. Divya Singh Pundir, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Lekhi, Adv. Ms. Tanya Singh, Adv. Ms. Anushna Satapathy, Adv. Mr. Tadimalla Bhaskar Gowtham, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv. Mr. Tathagat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh, AOR Mr. P.V. Surendernath, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, Adv. Mr. A.V.S.Raju, Adv. Mrs. Lekha.sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. S. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Raghavendren, Adv. Mr. M. Venkatesulu, Adv. Mr. Sriharibabu, Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhry , AOR M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR Mr. V. V. S. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. S. Murthy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Adv. Mr. Venkat Mayur, Adv. Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Agam Sharma, Adv. Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv. Ms. Nandini Pandey, Adv. M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR M/S. M. Rambabu And Co., AOR Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mullapudi Rambabu, Adv. Mr. Kakara Venkatrao, Adv. Mr. N. Eswara, Adv. Mr. B Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Ms. Nitipriya Kar, Adv. Mr. Bharat J Joshi, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR Mr. V N Murthy, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Sansanwal, Adv. Mr. P.V.SURENDEr Nath, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, Adv. Mr. A.V.S.Raju, Adv. Mrs. Lekha Sudhakaran, Adv. Mr. S. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. V Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Raghavendren, Adv. Mr. M Venkatesulu, Adv. Mr. M. Sriharibabu, Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR Mr. Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mandeep Kalra, AOR Ms. Radhika Narula, Adv. Ms. Divya Singh Pundir, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Lekhi, Adv. Ms. Tanya Singh, Adv. Ms. Anushna Satapathy, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Kumar Jha, AOR Ms. Puja Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Mahendra Kumar, Adv. Ms. Jasmine Damkewala, AOR Ms. Anu Gupta, AOR Mr. Kaushal Yadav, AOR Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhry , AOR Mr. Hemendranath Reddy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Namit Saxena, AOR Mr. Prashant Reddy, Adv. Mr. Vishal Prasad, AOR
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. special leave petition granted. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments related to ownership and partition. (Para 5 , 36 , 45) |
| 3. historical context of the paigah estate. (Para 6 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. unresolved claims and independent rights. (Para 70 , 173 , 174) |
| 5. final order dismissing all appeals. (Para 226) |
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
2. Delay condoned.
4. Aggrieved by a common judgment rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana in a batch of intra-Court appeals, confirming the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court in a batch of applications in a civil suit, various parties including the State of Telangana and some third parties have come up with these civil appeals.
Background Facts:
7. It appears that one Mir-Qamar-ud-din Khan (who was given the title Asaf Jah) was one of the feudal chiefs of the Moghuls and was the Governor of Deccan from 1713 to 1721. Later he proclaimed independence and founded the Asaf Jahi dynasty in
Click Here to Read the rest of this document