Neeraj Kumar vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(SC) 594

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 594

KRISHNA MURARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Neeraj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the parties : Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR Mr. Yajur Bhalla, Adv. Ms. Anchita Nayyar, Adv. Ms. Akansha Gulati, Adv. Ms. Ragini Sharma, Adv. Mr. Devashish Bharuka, AOR Ms. Sarvshree, Adv. Mr. Shobhit Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tushar Bakshi, AOR Mr. Vinod K. Soni, Adv. Mr. Mohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. R. Prashant Bhrigu, Adv. Mr. E . Elangovn, Adv. Dr. Amardeep Gaur, Adv. M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Nikunj, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Parul Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv. Ms. Deeksha Gaur, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, AOR Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Puran Mal Saini, Adv. Ms. Anzu K. Varkey, Adv. Mr. Pati Raj Yadav, Adv. Mr. Yogesh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Aditya Ranjan, AOR Mr. Devashish Bharuka, AOR Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Ms. Muskan Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Varun Punia, AOR Mr. R.P.Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR Mr. Subodh Kumar Pathak, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shashi Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. Shagun Ruhil, Adv. Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shaurya Lamba, Adv. Ms. Bano Deswal, Adv. Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR, J.

1. A recruitment process initiated in the year 2006 is still hanging fire. The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed CWP No. 20630 of 2006 relating thereto, titled Suman Lata and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others, by order dated 22.02.2007. However, by judgment dated 24.11.2021, this Court allowed Civil Appeal No. 7031 of 2021, titled Devender Bhaskar and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others and set aside the aforestated order dated 22.02.2007. This Court held that equivalence of qualifications is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, to determine. This observation was made in the context of the High Court’s finding that the Diploma in Art and Craft of Kurukshetra University was equivalent to the Diploma in Art and Craft of Haryana Industrial Training Department.

2. Review of the above judgment dated 24.11.2021 is sought by way of the present petitions. The review petitioners, 404 in all, secured Diplomas in Art and Craft from Kurukshetra University and are aggrieved by the finding of non-equivalence of their qualification with the Diploma in Art and Craft of the Haryana Industrial Training Department. The petitions for review are gran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 594

KRISHNA MURARI, SANJAY KUMARNeeraj Kumar – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

KRISHNA MURARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Neeraj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent