V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
Shahrukh @ Banti – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
1. The above appeal arises out of an order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore, cancelling the regular bail granted to the appellant by the Sessions Court, Indore, in an application registered suo moto by the High Court under section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
2. The fact remains that the appellant was implicated in a criminal complaint registered on 21.1.2020 for alleged offences punishable under section 9 read with section 2(16)(c), 9, 27, 29, 51, 52 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and section 2(d), 5, 15, 16 of M.P. Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1969 and section 7, 55, 58 of Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
3. After the appellant’s anticipatory bail application was rejected, the appellant was arrested on 6.6.2022. After the arrest, the investigation qua the appellant was completed and a supplementary charge sheet was filed against him on 3.8.2022.
4. Thereafter, the Session Court granted regular bail to the appellant by an order dated 5.9.2022, taking into account the fact that the appellant has already spent three months in custody and that the charge sheet has already been filed. The Sessions Court also took
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.