Back
PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Sunny Wadhwani S/o Shri Murlidhar Wadhwani – Appellant
Versus
Mayank S/o Jawahar Chandwani – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard and perused the record.
This order shall govern the disposal of the applicant's application filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C for cancellation of bail.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the order dated 03.08.2023 passed by Eighth Additional Sessions & Special Judge (OAW), Indore in ST No.436/2023 in connection with FIR Number/Crime No.272/2023 of Police Station Rajendra Nagar, District Indore for the offence punishable under section 304-B of IPC, 1860 and Section 3&4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, whereby respondent No.1 has been granted bail.
3. In brief, the contentions of the application are that the respondent no.1 is the husband of the deceased, and due to his cruelty and harassment the deceased committed suicide. Hence, the police has registered the FIR against the respondent and co-accused. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the learned trial Court by its impugned order, ignoring the legal pronouncements and other facts & circumstances of the case, granted bail to respondent no.1 on the basis of parity with co-accused Jawahar S/o Goraldas Chandawni, whereas the bail of co-accused Jawah
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Amit Lahoti For the Respondent : D. R. Sharma, V. D. Sharma, A. K. Nirankari
The court has the authority to cancel bail if the order suffers from serious infirmities resulting in miscarriage of justice, and if the accused misuses their liberty, interferes with the investigati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the misuse of bail and the legal principles governing the cancellation of bail.
The court emphasized that the power to cancel bail demands overwhelming proof of changed circumstances or misuse of bail, maintaining that courts must be slow to intervene in bail decisions.
The discretion to grant bail must be exercised judiciously, considering the gravity of the offence, evidence, and potential obstruction of justice.
Bail may be canceled when an accused violates conditions, especially if such violations threaten the integrity of a fair trial, as established by precedents.
Bail should not be cancelled without clear evidence of violation of conditions or misuse of liberty, as established by the court's analysis.
The main legal point established is that the court will consider supervening circumstances or conduct of the accused post bail to justify cancellation, and will require evidence of violation of bail ....
Cancellation of bail should be treated differently from a bail application and should only be cancelled if strong and compelling reasons exist, as established by legal precedents and guidelines.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
