SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 654

B. V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Hem Raj – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Ritesh Khatri, AOR Ms. Mamta, Adv. Mr. Vikas Arora, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

JUDGMENT

Nagarathna, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been filed by the insured seeking indemnification of the total amount of INR 10,36,500/- from the respondent-insurance company, being aggrieved by the Order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC for short).

3. Briefly stated the facts are that the appellant is the owner of a Mahindra Pick-up Vehicle bearing registration no. PB-19H-2461 which is used by him for his personal use. That the appellant had purchased an insurance policy No.36060231130100003910 by paying the premium on the policy to the respondent-insurer covering the territory of India initially and later Nepal also. The period of the policy was from 21.03.2014 to 20.03.2015. On 11.09.2014, the vehicle was driven by Amritpal alongwith other people who visited Nepal to attend a satsang. Just prior to entry into Nepal i.e., before crossing the border, the appellant had got extended the insurance policy in the territory of Nepal. On 11.09.2014 at 10.00 am, at Gorhi Chowk, Ward No.4, Gram Vikas Samiti, District Bardia Belva (Nepal), the v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top