Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. SHAH, B.V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.
M/s Chopra Fabricators and Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Pumps and Compressors Ltd. & Anr. - Respondents
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4654 of 2022
Decided On : 01-04-2022
Arbitration Act - Frustration of Arbitration Proceedings
Fact of the Case:
The court expressed concern over the delay in executing an arbitration award from 1992, with the execution petition pending since 2003, highlighting the frustration of arbitration proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Registrar General to provide details of pending execution petitions and applications under the Arbitration Act, emphasizing the need for timely execution to uphold the purpose and object of the Arbitration Act and the Commercial Courts Act.
Issues: Delay in executing arbitration award, frustration of arbitration proceedings
Ratio Decidendi: Timely execution of arbitration awards is crucial to uphold the purpose and object of the Arbitration Act and the Commercial Courts Act.
Final Decision: The executing court was directed to decide and dispose of the execution petition within four weeks.
ORDER :
1. This is a glaring example of frustrating the arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act. The Award has been passed in the year 1992 and the execution petition is of the year 2003, which is still reported to be pending.
2. It is very unfortunate that even after a period of 30 years, the party in whose favour the Award is passed is not in a position to enjoy the fruit of the litigation/Award. Even the execution petition is also pending for more than 19 years.
3. This is a very sorry state of affairs that even the execution proceedings to execute the Award passed under the Arbitration Act are pending for more than 20 years. If the Award, under the Arbitration Act, is not executed at the earliest, it will frustrate the purpose and object of the Arbitration Act as well as the Commercial Courts Act. Even as per the new Commercial Courts Act, 2015 the commercial dispute is required to be decided and disposed of at the earliest and within the stipulated time provided under the Act, namely, one year. There must be number of such proceedings pending in the courts under the jurisdiction of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
4. We direct the Registrar General of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and the Lucknow Bench to place on record (i) how many execution petitions to execute the Award both under the Arbitration Act, 1940 and under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are pending in the subordinate courts/executing courts in the entire State; (ii) how many Section 34 applications are pending in the entire State and from which year and (iii) how many Section 37 applications are pending before the High Court and from which year.
5. The aforesaid information in the form of a detailed report shall be placed before this Court on or before the next date of hearing.
6. Put up on 28.04.2022 on top of the Board.
7. Insofar as the present case is concerned, considering the fact that the Award which is sought to be executed is of the year 1992 and the execution proceedings are pending since 2003, we direct the executing court to finally decide and dispose of the execution petition within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the present order.
The legislative intent behind the Arbitration Act and the Commercial Courts Act is to ensure the expeditious resolution of commercial disputes, and corrective measures must be taken to address the ba....
Parties should address delays in court proceedings at the appropriate court level before seeking intervention from higher courts.
Commercial Courts are empowered to execute arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, reaffirming the intent of the Commercial Courts Act for speedy resolution of commercial disputes....
Execution of arbitral award impermissible until pending Section 34 challenge attains finality.
Execution of an arbitral award requires compliance with the 90-day limitation under Section 34; execution petitions filed before this period are impermissible.
The court emphasized the necessity of expeditious disposal of execution petitions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, reinforcing directives from the Supreme Court.
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 grants jurisdiction to Commercial Courts for executing arbitral awards related to commercial disputes, emphasizing expedited resolution.
Financial transactions resembling financier dealings qualify as commercial disputes under Commercial Courts Act, requiring execution before Commercial Court.
The pendency of objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act does not automatically result in a stay of the arbitral award, and the award can be enforced like a decree of court....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
