Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Gati Kausar India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
B.K. Structural Contracts Private Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to execution of arbitral award. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. disputes regarding payment under agreement. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. limitation period for setting aside the award. (Para 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 4. timeline for application under section 34. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. execution of awards and legal requirements. (Para 17 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 27) |
| 6. court order for execution of payments. (Para 25 , 28 , 30) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. The present execution first appeal has been filed by the Appellant challenging the impugned orders dated 4th September, 2020 and 15th January, 2021 passed by the Ld. ADJ, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter "Executing Court"). By the impugned order dated 4th September, 2020, warrants of attachment have been issued by the Executing Court against the Judgment Debtor/Appellant herein (hereinafter "Judgment Debtor) in order to enforce the interim arbitral Award dated 16th November, 2019/1st February, 2020 passed by Ld. Arbitrator in favour of the Claimant/Decree Holder/Respondent herein (hereinafter "Decree Holder"). By the impugned order dated 15th January, 2021, the Executio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
