SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Gati Kausar India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
B.K. Structural Contracts Private Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present execution first appeal has been filed by the Appellant challenging the impugned orders dated 4th September, 2020 and 15th January, 2021 passed by the Ld. ADJ, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter "Executing Court"). By the impugned order dated 4th September, 2020, warrants of attachment have been issued by the Executing Court against the Judgment Debtor/Appellant herein (hereinafter "Judgment Debtor) in order to enforce the interim arbitral Award dated 16th November, 2019/1st February, 2020 passed by Ld. Arbitrator in favour of the Claimant/Decree Holder/Respondent herein (hereinafter "Decree Holder"). By the impugned order dated 15th January, 2021, the Execution application was disposed of by the Executing Court considering that the entire decretal amount had been paid by the Judgment Debtor.

3. The present case raises an important question in respect of passing of arbitral awards, the execution thereof, as also entertaining of objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter "the Act").

4. The dispute that has arisen betw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top