D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Vinay Kumar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
MANOJ MISRA, J.
1. The State of Uttar Pradesh (in short “the State of U.P.) is in appeal against the orders of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (in short, “the High Court”) dated 30.09.2022 and 12.05.2023 passed in Writ C No.37749 of 2019 and Civil Misc. Review Application No.525 of 2022 respectively.
FACTS
2. The respondent (original petitioner) was granted a mining lease to excavate five lakhs cubic meter of sand. The lease was for a period of five years viz., from 13.02.2019 to 12.02.2024. The royalty payable for the first year was Rs.26,35,00,000 and for each succeeding year it was to be higher by 10%.
3. The mining area was 25 hectares falling in plot nos.5 and 9 in village Bilharka, Tehsil Naraini, District Banda (State of U.P.).
4. Pursuant to the grant, the original petitioner obtained environmental clearance for mining in the area and in terms thereof the mining lease was executed appending therewith a map of the mining area.
5. According to the original petitioner, when he commenced mining operations, the district administration of Chhatarpur, State of Madhya Pradesh (in short, the State of M.P.) raised an objection to the mining operations conducted by the ori
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.