MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Amarnath Singh @ Amar Nath Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present writ petition was initially filed for quashing the letter dated 27.12.2019 issued by the respondent Special Secretary-cum-Director, Mines & Geology Department, in exercise of Rule 77(2) of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules, 2019’) whereby the settlement period of settlees of sand ghat in the State of Bihar, which was ending on 31.12.2019, had been extended till 31.10.2020, as also to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to conduct the mining activity at the Aurangabad Sone sand ghat bearing no. 32. The petitioner had also prayed to hold that the settlement term of the respondent no. 8 cannot be extended and no other person can be allowed to conduct mining of sand in the District of Aurangabad without having obtained an environmental clearance from the competent authority. Subsequently the petitioner had also prayed for quashing the decision of the Government of Bihar dated 29.12.2020 whereby the settlement period of the existing settlees of sand ghat in the State of Bihar has been extended till 30.03.2021. However, with the efflux of time, the pet
Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co.
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority v. Raghu Nath Gupta
Mrutunjay Pani v. Narmada Bala Sasmal [AIR 1961 SC 1353
Jai Durga Finvest Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. reported in (2004) 3 SCC 381
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Brajo Nath Ganguly & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.