JUDGMENT :

J. K. MAHESHWARI, J.

1. In the present appeals, respondent Jaswant Singh was recruited as a constable with Punjab Police. During probation, he was discharged from the services by Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar (hereinafter referred to as “S.S.P.”) in exercise of power under Rule 12.21 of Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (hereinafter referred to as “PPR”). Challenging the same, the respondent-plaintiff filed a suit, which was partly decreed by the Trial Court and the discharge order was held to be illegal on the ground that it was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice.

2. Assailing the same, the appellants/State preferred first appeal before Additional District Judge, Amritsar. Simultaneously, the respondent-plaintiff also filed a first appeal and sought relief of mandatory injunction on the ground that since the order discharging him from services was not found legally sustainable, therefore, he should be allowed to join duty and should be granted all the consequential benefits. The first appellate Court by common judgment dismissed the appeal filed by State and allowed the appeal of the respondent-plaintiff holding him entitled to receive all service benefits as accrued.

3. Challenging the common judgment passed by the first appellate Court, two regular second appeals were filed before the High Court by the State Government. The first one was against the judgment in their appeal passed by the first appellate Court and the second was against the grant of mandatory injunction granting all service benefits to the respondent-plaintiff. Both the appeals were dismissed by the impugned judgment, against which the present appeals have been filed.

4. Brief facts of the case are that, the respondent-plaintiff was appointed as constable in Punjab Police on probation, who joined on 12.11.1989 and was allotted number 1669. He was sent for training to ‘Police Recruits Training Centre, Jahan Khelan, District Hoshiarpur’ (hereinafter referred to as “Training Centre”). Meanwhile, he along with other recruit constables were sent to Amritsar on 24.11.1990 for special duty as security guards. After the completion of the said assignment, all the constables deputed on duty were relieved and they reported back to the Training Centre, except respondent-plaintiff who remained absent without any intimation. The Superintendent of Police of the Training Centre (hereinafter referred to as “S.P.”) came to know about such conduct and reported to S.S.P. Amritsar vide memorandum dated 21.02.1991. It was stated therein that owing to prolonged absence from duty without intimation, respondent-plaintiff had no interest in training, and he lacked a sense of responsibility. Therefore, it was recommended that he cannot prove himself to be a good, efficient police officer and he is setting a bad precedent for other trainees. The S.P. further recommended for his discharge from service under Rule 12.21 of PPR with a request to strike-off his name from the rolls of the Training Centre with immediate effect treating the absence period as on leave without pay. In furtherance to the said recommendation, the S.S.P. passed the order dated 28.03.1991, discharging the respondent-plaintiff. The said order is relevant and for ready reference is being reproduced as under:

“ORDER

No. 11369-76/B, Dated 28.03.1991

Constable Jaswant Singh No. 1669/ASR S/o Shri Hazara Singh, Caste Jat, R/o Village Thoba, PS Ramdass, Police District Majitha is hereby discharged from service under P.P.R. 12.21 as he is not likely to become an efficient Police Officer. His absent period from 24.11.1990 to date is treated as non-duty non pay.

Issue orders in OB.

Sd/-

xxxxxxxxxxx

Sr. Superintendent of Police,

Amritsar.”

5. The respondent-plaintiff being aggrieved by the order of discharge, filed Civil Suit No. 306 of 1994 seeking declaration that the said order is illegal, unconstitutional, null and void. He also prayed for a relief of mandatory injunction against appellants-defendants