SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1783

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Hemant Gupta, Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ.
Sheela Devi & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Limited & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 6275-6276 of 2022 (Arising Out of SLP(C) Nos. 18611-18612 of 2019)
Decided On : 07-09-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate, Mr. Manik Kapoor, Advocate, Mr. Mohit Rawat, Advocate, Mr. shashank S. Jha, Advocate, Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Pritika Juneja, Advocate, Ms. Versha Singh, Advocate, Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Advocate, Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, Advocate, for the Respondent.

The assessment of compensation in motor accident claims should be based on the deceased's income and age, in accordance with relevant legal precedents.

Headnote:

Compensation - Motor Accident Claims - National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi - 16 SCC 680

Fact of the Case:

The High Court reduced the amount of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal, based on the assessment of the deceased's income and the application of minimum wages.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court erred in assessing the deceased's income and applying minimum wages, contrary to the judgment in National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi. The Supreme Court recalculated the compensation based on the deceased's income and age, in accordance with the Pranay Sethi judgment.

Issues: Assessment of compensation, application of minimum wages, error in High Court's judgment

Ratio Decidendi: The compensation should be assessed based on the deceased's income and age, in accordance with the Pranay Sethi judgment. The High Court erred in applying minimum wages and assessing the deceased's income.

Final Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeals, computing the compensation at Rs. 20,05,000/- along with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim application till realization.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The challenge in the present appeals is to an order dated 15.03.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby the appeal of the Insurance Company was allowed and that of the Claimants was dismissed. The High Court reduced the amount of compensation to Rs.13,55,200/- from Rs. 29,84,052/-awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal.

3. The learned Tribunal granted 50% on account of future prospects, Rs.9 lakhs for loss of love and affection and Rs. 1 lakh each towards loss of estate and loss of consortium. The grant of compensation under the aforesaid heads is contrary to the Constitution Bench judgment in National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi & Ors., (2017) 16 SCC 680.

4. It is noted that the High Court assessed the income of the deceased as Rs. 6,000/- taking into consideration the minimum wage of skilled worker at the relevant time in State of Haryana. On the contrary, the Tribunal applied to minimum wages applicable for an unskilled laborer in Haryana during the relevant time, i.e., Rs. 8100/- per month.

5. We find that the High Court erred in relying upon the minimum wages fixed by the Deputy Commissioner on the ground that such wages are payable to the contingency fund. There is nothing on record that such wages were not the minimum wages. The High court had no basis to assess the minimum wages to Rs. 6,000/- pm. The deceased was motor mechanic and would be thus skilled workman. He was less than 40 years of age.

6. Thus, keeping in view the said income and the age of the deceased, the compensation is assessed as follows in terms of judgment of this Court in Pranay Sethi:

Head

Amount (Rs.)

A

Loss of earnings @ monthly salary @ Rs. 8100/- and future prospects @ 40% Less- Deduction @ 1/4 (8100 + 3240 - 2835 x 12 x 17)

17,35,020

B

Loss of Estate

15,000

C

Loss of Consortium (Rs. 40,000/- each

for 6 dependents)

2,40,000

D

Funeral Expenses

15000

Total

Rs.20,05,020

Rounded off

Rs.20,05,000

7. Hence, the compensation is computed as Rs. 20,05,000/- along with interest @ 9% p.a. as awarded by the learned Tribunal from the date of filing of the claim application till realization. Consequently, the order passed by the High Court is set aside. The appeals thus stand allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top