SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1816

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Surya Kant, Abhay S. Oka, JJ.
The Project Director National Highways Authority of India – Appellant
Versus
Saraswatibai Chandrakant Shinde & Ors. – Respondents
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12409 of 2022 (Arising Out of Impugned Final Judgment and order dated 28-04-2022 in WP No. 13863 of 2021 Passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad)
Decided On : 01-08-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG, Ms. Neetica Sharma, Advocate, Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate, Mr. Rishabh Dua, Advocate, Ms. Shivika Mehra, Advocate, Ms. Ameya Mahadik, Advocate, M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Advocate, Mr. Ajit Babanrao Kale, Advocate, Ms. Sakshi Ajit Kale, Advocate, Mr. Yash Prashant Sonavane, Advocate, for the Respondent.

The court directed NHAI to deposit 50% of the compensation amount with the Executing Court and make an endeavor to decide the pending proceedings within six months. The balance amount of compensation is to be deposited after determination under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

Headnote:

NHAI - Non-deposit of Compensation Amount - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34 - The court directed NHAI to deposit 50% of the compensation amount with the Executing Court and make an endeavor to decide the pending proceedings within six months. The balance amount of compensation is to be deposited after determination under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

Fact of the Case:

The NHAI acquired land in 2016 but did not deposit the compensation amount awarded. The High Court intervened and directed NHAI to deposit the amount as per the Arbitrator's Award before the Executing Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed NHAI to deposit 50% of the compensation amount with the Executing Court and make an endeavor to decide the pending proceedings within six months. The balance amount of compensation is to be deposited after determination under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

Issues: Non-deposit of compensation amount, pending Section 34 proceedings under the Arbitration Act, intervention by the High Court, and modification of the impugned order.

Ratio Decidendi: NHAI to deposit 50% of the compensation amount with the Executing Court and make an endeavor to decide the pending proceedings within six months. The balance amount of compensation is to be deposited after determination under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

Final Decision: The Special Leave Petition is disposed of, and the impugned order passed by the High Court of Bombay dated 28.04.2022 stands modified in the specified terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points

  • Subject: Civil Law - Property Law. [judgement_subject]
  • Act Referred: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Section 34. [judgement_act_referred]
  • Core Issue: Non-deposit of compensation by NHAI for land acquired and possessed in 2016, with pending Section 34 petitions lacking interim stay, execution petitions filed by landowners, and High Court directing full deposit per Arbitral Award. [1000783350001][1000783350002][1000783350003][1000783350004]
  • Direction 1: NHAI to deposit 50% of compensation as awarded by Arbitral Award with Executing Court within four weeks; amount to be released to landowners unconditionally. (!)
  • Direction 2: District Court handling Section 34 proceedings to endeavor to decide within six months. (!)
  • Direction 3: NHAI to deposit balance compensation (per outcome under Section 34) with Executing Court within four weeks of determination; amount releasable to landowners subject to parties' legal rights and remedies. (!)
  • Final Outcome: Special Leave Petition disposed of; High Court order dated 28.04.2022 modified as above; pending applications disposed of. [1000783350006][1000783350007][1000783350008]

ORDER

1. Heard Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, learned counsel who has appeared on caveat on behalf of the Respondent No.1.

2. The controversy pertains to the non-deposit of compensation amount awarded for the land, which the Petitioner-National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) had acquired and taken possession way back in the year 2016.

3. It appears that, being aggrieved by the Arbitral Award passed by the Ld. Arbitrator cum Commissioner, the NHAI has filed petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which are still pending without any interim stay.

4. Meanwhile, the land owners have filed Execution Petitions but no amount has been deposited with the Executing Court.

5. It is in these circumstances, that the High Court has intervened vide its impugned Order dated 28.04.2022, directing the NHAI to deposit the amount as per the Arbitrator's Award before the Executing Court on or before 30.06.2022.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the present proceedings with the following directions:

    i. The NHAI shall deposit 50 per cent of the compensation amount, as awarded by the Arbitral Court, with the Executing Court within a period of four weeks. The said amount shall be released to the land owners unconditionally.

    ii. The learned District Court, before whom the proceedings under Section-34 of the Arbitration Act are pending, shall make an endeavour to decide such proceedings within a period of six months.

    iii. The balance amount of compensation as per the Award to be passed under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, shall be deposited by the NHAI with the Executing Court within four weeks after such determination. The said amount shall also be released by the Executing Court in favour of the landowners subject to the rights and remedies available, to the parties in law.

7. With these observations and directions, the Special Leave Petition is disposed of.

8. The impugned order passed by the High Court of Bombay dated 28.04.2022 stands modified in above terms.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top