SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 947

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J. B. PARDIWALA
National Legal Services Authority – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Jayna Kothari, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Anindita Pujari, Advocate, Mr. Siddhartha Srivastava, Advocate, Mr. Abhineet Arvind, Advocate, Mr. Maitreya Saha, Advocate, Ms. Radhika Mohapatra, Advocate, Mr. M Saha, Advocate, Mr. Raghav Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG, Mr. K M Nataraj, ASG, Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate, Mr. Vatsal Noshi, Advocate, Mr. Gautam Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Shantwanu Singh, Advocate, Ms. Pragya Singh, Advocate, Mr. Akshay Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sunny Singh, Advocate, Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Advocate, M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, Advocate, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate, Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate, Ms. G. Indira, Advocate, Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate, Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate, Mr. B. Balaji, Advocate, Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Advocate, Ms. Limayinla Jamir, Advocate, Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate, Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Advocate, Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocate, Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Advocate, Mr. Devender Saini, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate, Ms. Himani Bhatnagar, Advocate, Mr. Jogy Scaria, Advocate, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Gupta, Advocate, Ms. Beena Victor, Advocate, Mr. Vivek Guruprasad Ballekere, Advocate, Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Advocate, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Advocate, Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Advocate, M/S. Corporate Law Group, Advocate, Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, Advocate, Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Advocate, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. We are not inclined to entertain a Miscellaneous Application in a disposed of proceedings.

2. The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly dismissed.

3. However, the applicant would be at liberty to pursue such remedies as are independently available in law.

4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top