SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1067

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, ARAVIND KUMAR
Chennai Metro Rail Limited – Appellant
Versus
Transtonnelstroy Afcons (JV) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Neetika Bajaj, Adv. Ms. Astha Garg, Adv. Mr. Kopal Mittal, Adv. Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, AOR Ms. Nishi Sangtani, Adv. Ms. Vani Vandana Chhetri, Adv. Mr. Naman Jain, Adv. Mr. Harsh, Adv. Ms. Mithu Jain, AOR Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Sairam Arjun Suresh, Adv. Mr. Jaskaran Singh Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Raghavendra Ross Divakaar, Adv. M/S. Dua Associates, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Darius Khambata, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manu Seshadri, Adv. Mr. Aveak Ganguly, Adv. Mr. Abhijit Lal, Adv. Mr. Anubhav Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sahil Manganani, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Adith Narayan, Adv. Ms. Mithu Jain, AOR Mr. Sanchit Garga, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.

1. Chennai Metro Rail Limited, the applicant (hereinafter referred to as “Chennai Metro”), a joint venture between the Central Government and the Government of Tamil Nadu, had, pursuant to a public tender, awarded the contract to the respondent (hereafter referred to as “Afcons”) have called for a project the total value of Rs. 1566 crores. The contract was signed on 31.01.2011. Eventually, on 15.04.2021, Afcons sought a reference of several heads of disputes to arbitration after certain interlocutory proceedings. Eventually on 29.04.2021, it was agreed that two dispute heads (claim 2(b) to 2(d)) and the Chennai Metro’s counter claim would be referred to a three-member tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter “the Act”). The tribunal was then constituted.

2. The tribunal by Minutes dated 14.05.2021 recorded the agreement of parties, that the hearing fee for each arbitrator (there were three members of the Tribunal) was fixed at Rs.1,00,000/- per session of hearing date. During the course of the proceedings, one member of the tribunal passed away and had to be substituted, which was done on 12.08.2021. The parties proceeded wi


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top