SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1096

HIMA KOHLI, RAJESH BINDAL
C. Anil Chandran – Appellant
Versus
M. K. Raghavan – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

(Rajesh Bindal, J.)

1. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order in a Writ Appeal1[Writ Appeal No. 1563 of 2010, decided on 27.06.2011], passed by the Division Bench of the High Court2[High Court of Kerala], by which the judgment of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P. No. 36424 of 2005, was set aside.

2. Challenge in the W.P. filed by the appellant was to the order dated 14.03.2005, passed by the Chief Engineer, Irrigation and Administration, Thiruvananthapuram vide which the private-respondents No. 1 to 4, 7 and 8 were given seniority from back date.

3. Learned senior counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant was appointed as Overseer Grade-III in the Irrigation Department vide G.O. (Rt.) No. 276/89/Co-op dated 16.06.1989, on compassionate basis. As the appellant was an Engineering Graduate, he represented to the Government for appointment as Assistant Engineer (Mechanical). His representation was rejected. O.P. No. 7647 of 1991 was filed praying for setting aside of the order of rejection of his representation with a further prayer that he should be appointed as Assistant Engineer with retrospective effect, from the date he was appointed as Overseer


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top