JUDGMENT :

RAJESH BINDAL, J.

1. Aggrieved against the order¹ [Dated 11.05.2011] passed by the High Court² [High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore] in the Writ Petition³ [W.P. (C) No. 824 of 2011] filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Management is before this Court in appeal. Vide the aforesaid order [dated 11.05.2011] three orders⁴ [Dated 30.06.2010, 12.08.2010 and 06.10.2010 passed by the Labour Court] passed by the Labour Court⁵ [Labour Court, Dewas, Madhya Pradesh] were set aside with a direction to the Labour Court to allow the appellants-Management to exercise liberty only in relation to correction of factual errors in the order.

FACTS

2. The facts of the case, as evident from the record, are that the appellants-Management moved an application under Section 25-N of the ID Act⁶ [The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (‘ID Act’)] seeking permission to retrench 45 workmen w.e.f. 01.12.2000. However, vide order dated 16.10.2000, the permission was declined by the Labour Commissioner and the application filed by the appellants-Management was rejected. Thereafter, the workmen raised certain demands on 09.10.2001, seeking increase of wages and other facilities. The Labo