Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
V.K. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition procedure addressed (Para 1) |
| 2. background of termination dispute (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. appellant's arguments against jurisdiction (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on jurisdiction issues (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. interpretation of incidental matters in jurisdiction (Para 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 6. court's reasoning on jurisdictional challenges (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 7. final dismissal of the review petition (Para 19) |
ORDER
CM APPL. 46287/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
REVIEW PET. 214/2021 & CM APPL. 46286/2021
1. This Review Petition has been preferred to seek the review of the judgement dated 17.12.2007, whereby the Letters Patents Appeal preferred by the appellant to assail the judgement of the learned Single Judge dated 03.09.2007 was dismissed. The present review petition is barred by limitation. Condonation of delay is sought for a period of 4,959 days. There is absolutely no reasonable cause disclosed for such immense delay in seeking this review. In any event, we have heard learned counsel for the review petitioner/appellant on merits and we do not find merit either in the application seeking cond
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
