SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 120

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIKRAM NATH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ.
Axis Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Naren Sheth & Anr. – Respondent
Miscellaneous Application No.190 of 2024(Arising from Diary No. 50249/2023) In Civil Appeal No.2085 of 2022
Decided on : 19-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ujjal Banerjee, AOR, Mr. Akash Khurana, Adv.
For the Respondent: Ms. Neha Sharma, AOR, Mr. Surya Prakash, Adv., Ms. Megha Karnwal, AOR, Mr. Arjun Bhatia, Adv., Mr. Devesh Dubey, Adv., Ms. Mahima Kapur, Adv., Ms. Divya Singh Pundir, Adv., Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR

Headnote:

Clarification - Civil Appeal - The court clarified the word 'unsecured creditor' to be read as 'secured creditor' in the judgment dated 12.09.2023.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought clarification of the judgment dated 12.09.2023 in Civil Appeal No.2085 of 2022.

Finding of the Court:

The court clarified the word 'unsecured creditor' to be read as 'secured creditor' in the judgment dated 12.09.2023.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified the interpretation of the word 'unsecured creditor' in the judgment.

Final Decision: The miscellaneous application seeking clarification was disposed of accordingly.

ORDER :

Delay condoned.

2. This application is filed by the applicant-appellant seeking clarification of the judgment dated 12.09.2023 passed in Civil Appeal No.2085 of 2022.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. The word "unsecured creditor" referred to in paragraph 20 of the judgment be now read as "secured creditor".

5. Judgment dated 12.09.2023 is corrected to the above extent only.

5. Miscellaneous application is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top