SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 176

ABHAY S. OKA, SANJAY KAROL
Major Gen. Darshan Singh (D) By Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Brij Bhushan Chaudhary (D) by Lrs. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Abhay S. Oka, J.

FACTUAL ASPECTS

1. This appeal takes an exception to the judgment of the High Court in the second appeal preferred by the appellants. Appellant no.1 was the first plaintiff, and appellant no. 1(ii), (iii) and (iv), as well as appellant no. 2 were the co-plaintiffs. The original first respondent was the defendant in the suit. For convenience, we are referring to the parties with reference to their status before the Trial Court.

2. The defendant (Brij Bhushan Chaudhary) executed an agreement for sale dated 16th January 1980 (for short, ‘the suit agreement’) in favour of plaintiff no.1 (Major General (retd) Darshan Singh) in respect of plot of land admeasuring approximately 2438 sq. yards with structure thereon being residential House no.33, R.P. No. 2829, Sector 2-A, Chandigarh (for short, ‘the suit property’). The agreed consideration was Rs.3,50,000/-. A sum of Rs.30,000/- was paid by the plaintiff no. 1 to the defendant by way of earnest money. The sale deed was to be executed on or before 30th April 1980. Clause no.3 in the suit agreement provided that in the event of the failure of the defendant to honour the agreement, his liability will be to refund the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top