Back
VIKRAM NATH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Central Information Commission – Appellant
Versus
D. D. A. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Nath, J.
The autonomy and independence of administrative bodies are fundamental to their ability to perform their designated functions effectively. These institutions are established to carry out specialized tasks that require a level of impartiality and expertise, which can only be achieved if they are free from undue interference. Ensuring their independence is essential for maintaining the integrity and efficacy of the administrative system. Interfering in the functioning of these bodies can be detrimental, as it undermines their ability to operate efficiently and impartially. Such interference can stem from restrictive interpretations of their powers or direct interventions that impede their operational autonomy. Administrative bodies must have the freedom to establish and implement internal procedures and regulations that best suit their unique mandates and operational needs. The principle of non-interference is not merely an administrative convenience but a cornerstone for upholding the rule of law and ensuring that these bodies can serve the public interest effectively. When these institutions are allowed to function without external pressures, they can make
(1) Powers of Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) – Under Section 12(4) of RTI Act, CIC has authority to issue various forms of administrative guidelines, directives and instructions essential for e....
The court emphasized the purpose of the Right to Information Act in providing access to information and held that the appointment of PIOs is necessary to ensure compliance with the Act.
The Information Commission must inquire into complaints regarding misleading information under the RTI Act, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions.
Under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, a public authority is only required to provide existing information and is not obligated to create information, offer interpretations, provide advice, or draw infer....
The imposition of penalty by the State Information Commissioner was held invalid due to lack of statutory authority and necessary procedural safeguards under the Right to Information Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
