HRISHIKESH ROY, S. V. N. BHATTI
Vijay Nair – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
ORDER
1. As the petitioner is in jail, delay stands condoned.
2. Heard Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Ms. Rebecca M. John, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Suryaprakash V. Raju, learned ASG appearing for the Directorate of Enforcement.
3. The present SLP challenges the order of the Delhi High Court rejecting Bail of Vijay Nair who is a co-accused in Delhi Excise policy scam. It is alleged that the petitioner acted as a middleman and was involved in irregularities in framing and implementing the Delhi Excise policy.
4. In support of the bail plea for the petitioner, it is submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 13.11.2022 and has now been in custody for about 22 months. It is then pointed out that since the charge is of money laundering under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, the “Act”), the maximum punishment in the event of conviction is 7 years and as such further detention will not be justified. The bail having been granted to the co-accused (Manish Sisodia and Kalvakuntla Kavitha) are also referred on behalf of the petitioner to claim bail on parity.
5. On the other hand, Mr. S.V. Raju, learned ASG wo
Kalvakuntla Kavitha v Directorate of Enforcement
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India
Ramkripal Meena v Directorate of Enforcement 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2276 [Para 9] – Relied
Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh v State of Maharashtra and Anr 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1693 [Para 9] – Relied
Manish Sisodia v Directorate of Enforcement 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1920] [Para 9 & 10] – Relied
Prem Prakash v. Union of India through the Directorate of Enforcement
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.