Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH
Krishan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement (ED) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pmla case from scholarship fraud fir/cbi probe (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. bail on innocence, parity, no tampering risk (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 3. ed alleges shell entities, forgery, laundering (Para 16 , 17) |
| 4. pmla section 45 twin conditions mandatory (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. delay by accused no bail ground (Para 20 , 23) |
| 6. trial delay not applicant's fault (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. precedents relax pmla rigors for delays (Para 30 , 32 , 34 , 35) |
Judgment :
Virender Singh, J.
By way of present application, filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), applicant- Krishan Kumar has sought his release, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, in case No. ECIR/SHSZO/04/2019, dated 19.07.2019, registered with the Directorate of Enforcement, Sub-Zonal Office, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘PMLA’).
2. According to the applicant, one FIR No. 133 of 2018, dated 16th November, 2018, was registered with Police Station East, Shimla, on the complaint made by State Project Officer
PMLA Section 45 twin conditions relaxable by constitutional courts for bail if prolonged custody (over 2 years) and unlikely timely trial violate Article 21, absent accused delay, with voluminous doc....
In PMLA cases, constitutional courts grant bail despite Section 45 twin conditions if prolonged incarceration (over two years), trial delay not attributable to accused, and no reasonable trial conclu....
Constitutional courts may relax PMLA Section 45 twin conditions for bail when prolonged incarceration and unlikely timely trial due to voluminous evidence violate Article 21 speedy trial rights.
PMLA Section 45 twin conditions relaxable by constitutional courts where voluminous evidence delays trial unreasonably, prolonged custody violates Article 21 speedy trial right, ensuring bail despite....
The right to a speedy trial is fundamental under Article 21, and prolonged incarceration without trial infringes on this right, warranting bail despite serious allegations.
The right to bail prevails over statutory restrictions when prolonged incarceration without trial violates constitutional rights.
The right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution prevails, allowing bail under Section 436A of the CrPC despite statutory restrictions in the PMLA.
The right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution mandates that an undertrial cannot be detained beyond half of the maximum sentence without trial, warranting bail under Section 436-A ....
The right to a speedy trial under Article 21 mandates release under Section 436-A of the CrPC after serving half of the maximum imprisonment period, regardless of the nature of the offence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
