SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1113

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.K. MAHESHWARI, RAJESH BINDAL, JJ.
Varghese George @ Jomon (Died) Through Its LRs. – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 13186 of 2024 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 18661 of 2019)
Decided On : 14-10-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, AOR Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K Sita Rama Rao, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Maibam Nabaghanashyam Singh, AOR

The court restored the Tribunal's compensation award, correcting income assessment and future prospects in line with established legal precedents.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation - Appeal against High Court order reducing compensation in a motor accident claim case - Tribunal awarded Rs. 51,58,458/-; High Court reduced it to Rs. 45,18,208/- - Court restored Tribunal's award, correcting income assessment and future prospects - Total compensation restored to Rs. 51,58,458/-. (Paras 2, 9, 10)

(B) Future Prospects - Assessment of future prospects for income - Court held that the injured being in private employment was entitled to future prospects of 40%, correcting the High Court's assessment. (Paras 7, 8)

ORDER

Rajesh Bindal, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 31.01.2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala [In M.A.C.A. No. 2325 of 2012] seeking enhancement of compensation in a motor accident claim case. The Tribunal [Additional Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Alappuzha] had awarded compensation of Rs.51,58,458/- under various heads along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization. The High Court reduced the compensation to Rs. 45,18,208/- by mainly reducing the income of the injured.

3. The facts as available on record are that on 09.10.2005 at about 8 PM, the appellant was returning after worship from Velankanni Church along with other passengers in a Toyota Qualis Van bearing Registration No. KL-4/R-4796 on Kottayam-Kumali National Highway, when the vehicle suddenly fell into a gorge called "Mathai Kokka" situated 500 meters east of Peerumade. The appellant and other passengers were severely injured. The injured passengers were shifted to Pushpagiri Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla where the appellant remained under treatment for 42 days.

4. The appellant (now deceased and represented through his legal representatives) was 24 years old when the accident took place. He was working as Sales Officer at a Hyundai dealership. On account of the accident, the appellant suffered injuries over the spine and head causing complete quadriplegia. He remained permanently bedridden and paralyzed for the rest of his life.

4.1 The appellant filed a claim petition [OP (MV) No. 360 of 2006] before the Tribunal. On the basis of the disability certificate, the Tribunal assessed the functional disability of the deceased-appellant as 100% and his monthly income was taken as Rs. 12,000/-. While granting compensation under various other heads, the Tribunal awarded a total amount of Rs. 51,58,458/-. The details are as under:

Heads

Compensation (Rs.)

Loss of earning from date of accident till Petition

60,000/-

Loss of future earning

24,48,000/-

Pain and suffering

50,000/-

Medical Expenses

14,56,458/-

Future Treatment expenses

8,00,000/-

Loss of amenities

3,00,000/-

Extra nourishment

4,000/-

Loss of marriage prospects

40,000/-

Total

51,58,458/-

5. The award of the Tribunal was challenged before the High Court. The High Court reduced the amount of compensation from Rs. 51,58,458/- to Rs. 45,18,208/- primarily reducing the income of the appellant (now deceased). However, the error in applying the multiplier of 17 was corrected by the High Court by granting multiplier of 18 and attendant charges were granted. The total amount of compensation assessed by the High Court and the details thereof are as under:

Heads

Compensation (Rs.)

Loss of future earning

(reduced) 17,82,000/-

Loss of earning from date of accident till Petition

(reduced) 35,750/-

Pain and suffering

(enhanced) 1,00,000/-

Medical Expenses (no comments by HC)

14,56,458/-

Bystander expense

(granted) 3,00,000/-

Future Treatment expenses

(upheld) 8,00,000/-

Loss of amenities

(upheld) 3,00,000/-

Extra nourishment

(upheld) 4,000/-

Loss of marriage prospects (no comments by HC)

40,000/-

Total

45,18,208/-

6. The aforesaid order passed by the High Court is under challenge in the present appeal. At the time of filing of the petition, the injured was alive, however during the pendency thereof before this Court, he died on 20.08.2022.

7. A perusal of the order passed by this Court shows that the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned and notice was issued limited to enhancement of the amount quantified for bystander expenses. However, while examining the matter in detail, it is noticed that the future prospects a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top