SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1762

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MANOJ MISRA
Mayukh Datta – Appellant
Versus
Garima Valecha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Nandadevi Deka, Kwanpreet, Rituraj Choudhary, Rituraj Biswas
For the Respondent: Gagan Gupta

Table of Content
1. parties reached a settlement in mediation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court grants divorce by mutual consent. (Para 3 , 4)
3. custody and support arrangements post-divorce. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. financial obligations payable by petitioner. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. transferring property rights and procedures. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
6. agreements to not file future legal claims. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. confirmation of finality and understanding of settlement. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)

ORDER :

2. For convenience of reference, the settlement is extracted below:

(Mr. Mayukh Datta)

(Ms. Garima Valecha)

(Mr. Rituraj Biswas)

(Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate)

(Ms Nanda Devi Deka)

Advocate for the Respondent

Advocates for the Petitioner

(Ms. Manjula Gupta) Mediator

4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the mutually expressed desire of the parties, we order and direct that there shall be a decree for divorce by mutual consent in the exercise of the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution. Both the parties shall comply with their respective obligations in terms of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top