C. T. RAVIKUMAR, RAJESH BINDAL
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajani Sahoo – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The insurer of the vehicle bearing Registration No. OR-04-D-5675, held as the offending vehicle, filed the captioned appeal against the judgment dated 07.02.2018 passed by the High Court of Orissa, at Cuttack in MACA No.627 of 2016 dismissing the appeal filed against the award dated 07.05.2016 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nayagarh, in MAC No.57 of 2009. The claim petition was filed by the respondents herein seeking compensation for the death of one Udayanath Sahoo who succumbed to the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident involving the motorcycle, being driven by him and the vehicle insured with the appellant. The aforesaid offending vehicle dashed against the rear side of the motorcycle ridden by the deceased Udayanath Sahoo when he was going to Bahadajhola at about 01.10 pm on 27.04.2019. Consequent to the hit, the motorcycle dashed against a tree standing by the road and Udayanath Sahoo succumbed to the injuries sustained and the pillion got severely injured. In connection with the accident, FIR No.61/2009 was registered at Police Station Sarankul. The legal heirs of deceased Udayanath Sahoo, the responde
Mathew Alexander v. Mohammed Shafi & Anr. (2023) 13 SCC 510; 2023 INSC 621 [Para 8] – Relied.
Death in motor accident – Question regarding negligence which is essential for passing an award in a motor vehicle accident claim should be considered based on evidence available before Tribunal – If....
Claimants must establish negligence in motor vehicle accident cases based on the preponderance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt.
In motor accident cases, the standard of proof required is preponderance of probabilities, and the court must take a holistic view of evidence to infer culpability from reasonable circumstances.
In civil proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act, the standard of proof is based on the preponderance of probability, and claimants are not required to prove the accident beyond reasonable doubt. Th....
Contributory negligence cannot be presumed from law violations unless evidence links the violation to the accident's cause or severity.
The charge of rash and negligent driving is to be proved on the touchstone of preponderance of probabilities and not beyond reasonable doubt, and the comprehensive/package insurance policy covering t....
In motor vehicle accident claims, negligence must be established on a preponderance of probabilities, not beyond reasonable doubt, and the absence of strict evidence does not negate the claim.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of proving rash and negligent driving based on preponderance of probabilities, emphasizing the significance of FIR as evidence a....
The court established that the principle of ‘res ipsa loquitur’ can shift the burden of proof in negligence cases, particularly when a charge-sheet is filed against the driver, indicating prima facie....
Once a charge-sheet is filed, it is not justifiable for the Tribunal to find negligence contrary to the findings in the charge-sheet merely because of some material in the scene mahazar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.