SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 689

B. R. GAVAI, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Ramyash @ Lal Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Narender Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Yadav, AOR Ms. Smita Singh Deo, Adv. Mr. Surjeet Singh,Adv. Dr. Amardeep Gaur,Adv. Dr. NBV Srinivasa Reddy,Adv. Mr. Vishal Tiwari,Adv. M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co., AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Mr. Shaurya Krishna,Adv. Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. Nagendra Singh, Adv. Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Naman Raj Singh, Adv. Mr. Gurrick Jassar, Adv. Mr. Mohit Kumar Singh,Adv. For M/S. V. Maheshwari & Co. Mrs. Nanita Sharma, AOR Mr. Vivek Sharma,Adv. Ms. Sabnam Sultana,Adv. Mr. Deepanshu Rana,Adv. Ms. Aswathi M.K., AOR

JUDGMENT :

(B.R. Gavai, J.)

1. These criminal appeals challenge the judgement and final order dated 8th February 2019 passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Misc. Correction Application No. 2 of 2019 which had been preferred by the accused persons namely, Bhupendra Singh, Moti Lal and Prahlad.

2. The Correction Application purportedly sought a clarification of a previous judgment and final order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court on 21st May 20181[Hereinafter referred to as “First Judgment”], by which the High Court had dismissed the criminal appeals preferred by the accused persons and had affirmed the judgment passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4, Jaunpur in Sessions Trial No. 277 of 20122[Hereinafter referred to as ‘trial court’] wherein the trial court had convicted the accused persons for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 323 read with 34, and Sections 452, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 18603[‘IPC’ for short] and sentenced them to suffer imprisonment for life.

3. Subsequently however, the High Court by way of the impugned judgment and order allowed the Correction Application preferred by the ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top