SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ.
M/s. Coal India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs (Port), Customs House, Kolkata – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 8028 of 2010
Decided on : 01-05-2025
Customs Act, 1962 – Section 14(1)(a) read with Rule 9(1)(a) and Rule 9(1)(e) of Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 – Computation of assessable value of imported goods – Short levy of customs duty due to non-inclusion of service fees/agency commission/charges in assessable value of spare parts so imported – All imported goods were initially cleared on the basis of provisional assessment – Thereafter, Assistant Commissioner passed order-in-original finalizing provisional assessment – Appellant was granted personal hearing in which representative of appellant stated that it will pay any short levy of duty as per law after considering the facts – What would be excluded for computing assessable value for the purpose of levy of customs duty is any amount paid for post-importation activities including any amount paid for post-importation technical assistance – Services rendered by Indian agent were not post-importation activities – Services provided were directly relatable to import of goods by way of product support service which is covered by Sections 14(1) and 14(1A) of Customs Act read with Rule 9(1)(e) of Customs Valuation Rules – View taken by all lower authorities affirmed. (Paras 21, 22, 31, 33 and 34)
Facts of the case:
This is an appeal under Section 130E of Customs Act, 1962 against the order dated 20.04.2010 passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in appeal No.CDM-164/2004. Appellant had filed appeal No.CDM-164/2004 before Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (‘CESTAT’) assailing order dated 21.06.2004 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata confirming order of Assistant Commissioner of Customs and dismissing appeal filed by appellant.
Findings of Court:
View taken by all lower authorities is correct and no interference is warranted. There is no merit in appeal.
Result : Appeal dismissed.
Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points regarding the computation of assessable value for imported goods:
JUDGMENT :
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
This is an appeal under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order dated 20.04.2010 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in appeal No.CDM-164/2004.
2. Be it stated that appellant had filed appeal No.CDM-164/2004 before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (‘CESTAT’ for short hereinafter) assailing the order dated 21.06.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata confirming the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs and dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant.
3. This Court by order dated 10.09.2010 had condoned the delay and had issued notice.
4. Relevant facts may be briefly noted.
5. Appellant is a Government of India undertaking and has subsidiaries in the country.
6. On 26.02.2000, Central Coalfields Limited, which is a subsidiary of the appellant, had invited sealed tenders for supply of spare parts for P&H Shovel.
7. On 28.03.2000, M/s Harnischfeger Corporation, USA submitted its quotations through its distributor M/s Voltas Limited. In the terms and conditions, towards engineering and technical service fees an amount of 8 percent of the Free on Board (FOB) amount valued on pro-rata basis against each shipment, was to be paid to M/s Voltas Limited, Kolkata in Indian rupees. Payment to be made to M/s Voltas Limited was not to be deducted from the FOB amount.
8. On 03.04.2000, M/s Voltas Limited submitted detailed quotation on behalf of its principal M/s Harnischfeger Corporation, USA (foreign supplier).
9. Purchase order was placed on 20.12.2000 with the foreign supplier for supply of spares required for P&H Shovel. Clause 5 of the purchase order is relevant and reads thus:
| 5. Terms of payment: (A) 100% of the FOB value shall be paid in US$ by means of a confirmed, divisible and irrevocable letter of credit which will be established in your favour through the State Bank of India, Corporate Accounts Group Br. 34, J.L. Nehru Road, Calcutta- 700071 (India) or their branch at USA against presentation of the following documents, in three sets as indicated against each:- | |
| (i) Invoice (ii) Packing List (iii) Shipping Specification (iv) Certificate of Origin (v) Warranty Certificate (vi) Bill of Lading (vii) Certificate that | Original plus three certified copies. Original plus three certified copies. Original plus three certified copies. Original plus three certified copies. Original plus three certified copies. Original plus three certified copies. “No Commission, Rebate, Discount, Margin or Egg. & Technical Service Charge etc. from the net FOB value of the contract or over & above FOB value of the contract is payable by M/s Harnischfeger Corporation, USA to any agent.” |
(1) Documents from sl. no.(i) to (vii) form a complete set.
(2) One copy of packing list & certificate of origin should be inserted inside each package for reference & identification purpose of the items packed in the particular package.
(3) One copy consisting of a set of documents from sl. no. (i) to (vii) should also be sent by courier well in advance along with technical literatures/pamphlets, dimensional drawings, sketch, quality certificate, warranty certificate etc. to avoid delay in effecting clearance of goods and also their proper receipt at ultimate consignee and its accountal etc. to the following:
(a) The Dy. Chief Engineering, C&F Department, Coal India Ltd., 6-Lyons Range, Calcutta- 700001 (India).
(b) The Chief General Manager (Equipment), Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi – 834001 (India).
(c) The Dy. Chief Materials Manager (P), Central Coalfields Limited, 15, Park Street, Calcutta – 700001 (India).
(d) The Dy. Chief Materials Manager (P), Purchase Deptt., Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi – 834001 (India).
(e) The Finance Manager (HQ), C
Collector of Customs (Preventive), Ahmedabad Vs. Essar Gujarat Ltd., Surat
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Bhubaneswar
Commissioner of Customs (Ports), Kolkata Vs. J.K. Corpn. Ltd.
Computation of assessable value of imported goods – What would be excluded for computing assessable value for the purpose of levy of customs duty is any amount paid for post-importation activities in....
Customs authorities must prove undervaluation with substantial evidence, including contemporaneous import prices, rather than relying solely on unattested initial export declarations.
The burden of proof lies on the importer to show that transaction values between related parties are not influenced by their relationship, as per Customs Valuation Rules.
The valuation of imported goods must include royalties as essential conditions of sale when determining the transaction value.
The court reaffirms that service fees unrelated to the sale contract cannot be included in customs valuation.
Transportation charges reimbursed by principal to C&F agent for arranging transport via authorised carriers are pure agent reimbursements, not includible in C&F service value under Section 67; Rule 5....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.