SUDHANSHU DHULIA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
NDA Securities Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to case facts and procedural history (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. analysis of high court's errors in judgment (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. decision to set aside high court's order (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. final order on funds during trial pendency (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant before this court assails the order dated 25.02.2025, passed by the High Court of Delhi, which has allowed a petition under section 482 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (hereinafter ‘CrPC’) filed by respondent no. 2 (through its Director); thereby directing the release of Rs. 15.90 lakhs being withheld by the Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (hereinafter ‘BSE’) as payout for sale of certain shares in his favor on superdari subject to him furnishing a Guarantee of the same amount, before the Magistrate Court.
3. The appellant and respondent no. 2 are both companies engaged in the trade of shares/securities and are registered with the BSE. On 07.08.2015, on a complaint made by the appellant (through its Managing Director), under Section 156(3) CrPC, an FIR was registered under Section 420 , 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinafter ‘IPC’). In this
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Aryan Singh & Ors. (2023) 18 SCC 399 [Para 10]
Dharambeer Kumar Singh v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr. (2025) 1 SCC 392 [Para 10]
The High Court overstepped its jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC by ordering the release of withheld funds amid ongoing investigations, potentially impeding justice and the investigation process.
Against the revisional order of the Sessions Court 482 is maintainable.
The court emphasized that the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be sparingly and circumspectly exercised, and only in the rarest of rare cases.
Points of laws : Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing an investigation, restrained investigating agency from arresting accused persons during investigation.
The inherent powers under Section 482 should be exercised in a given and deserving case where the Court is satisfied that exercise of such power would either prevent abuse of such power or such exerc....
The inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be used to revive quashed FIRs, as the judiciary becomes functus officio post-judgment, with an absolute bar to altering such judgments except for....
The transfer of shares without proper documentation and board resolution constituted a prima facie case for trial, and the pendency of a civil proceeding cannot bring an end to a criminal proceeding.
The High Court improperly quashed criminal proceedings under Section 482 without sufficient grounds, emphasizing that all allegations meriting investigation must be thoroughly considered.
Further investigation – Provisions of Section 173(8), Cr.P.C. do not limit or affect such powers of High Court to pass order under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for further investigation or reinvestigation, i....
Magistrate has power to order further investigation – Chief Police Officer of a district has no power to order further investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.