SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.K. MAHESHWARI, K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ.
Geeta Mandal – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Manager United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6572 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 21110 of 2024)
Decided On : 09-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion and order of appeal. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. contributory negligence findings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. reasoning on contributory negligence percentage. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. modification of negligence findings and compensation. (Para 7) |
ORDER
1) Leave granted.
2) On the short point of recording the finding of contributory negligence of 50% of the deceased and 50% of the offending vehicle by the MACT [Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kamrup (M), Guwahati], affirmed by the High Court [Gauhati High Court], the present appeal has been filed by the mother (dependent) of Mr. Rajesh Mandal who died in a road accident.
3) The facts involved in the present appeal are that on 27.12.2015 at about 10.20 p.m., Mr. Rajesh Mandal (deceased), aged 27 years, riding a motorcycle bearing Registration No.AS-01-AN-4529 met with an accident with truck bearing registration No. BR-30-B-3439 and succumbed to the injuries.
4) The MACT allowed the compensation as Rs.65,01,948/- holding the deceased negligent and to have contributed to the accident to the extent of 50% and the remaining 50% to the offending vehicle. The High Court confirmed the finding of contributing negligence and the amount of compensation. It is only on the point of contributory negligence and resultant 50% deduction from the compensation amount as held by the MACT, confirmed by the High Court, which is questioned in this appeal.
5) We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the spot map. As per the spot map, it is clear that the offending vehicle, that is, truck bearing registration No. BR-30-B-3439 was coming from the northern side towards southern side, while the deceased was going on a motorcycle bearing registration No. AS-01-AN-4529 from southern to northern side. Looking to the angle of movement made by both the vehicles, which is quite near to the middle of the road, it appears that the finding of contributory negligence of 50% of the deceased as recorded is unjustified.
6) On going through the facts of the case and on perusal of the material placed, in our view, the negligence of the deceased may be right; however, the contribution in accident may be maximum to the extent of 10% and that of the offending vehicle (truck) bearing registration No. BR-30-B-3439 would be of 90%.
7) Accordingly, we modify the finding of MACT and the High Court on the issue of contributory negligence of the deceased from 50% to 10%. In view of the foregoing and with the aforesaid modification on the issue of contributory negligence of the deceased to 10%, the differential amount of compensation as determined by the MACT and the High Court be paid to the claimant within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
8) In the above terms, the civil appeal is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
The Supreme Court modified the contributory negligence from 50% to 10% for the deceased, attributing 90% negligence to the offending vehicle, based on reassessment of accident circumstances.
The Court modified the contributory negligence ratio from 50% to 25% for the deceased, determining liability based on the circumstances of the accident.
The court emphasized that contributory negligence should reflect greater shared responsibility when both parties are at fault, leading to a modified compensation award that accurately accounts for in....
Point of Law : Rider of motorcycle is also responsible for the accident. But attributing 60% of contributory negligence to the rider of the motorcycle, especially, in the absence of any oral evidence....
The court determined that both parties contributed to the accident, assigning negligence at 40% to the deceased and 60% to the driver, impacting overall compensation.
Contributory negligence and compensation assessment in motor accident claims were affirmed, with the court highlighting the importance of valid driving documentation in determining liability.
Contributory negligence assessed at 10% establishes that compensation must reflect accurate income estimates and disability assessments, leading to a modified award.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.