Back
UJJAL BHUYAN, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Rajinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of the case and interim order issued. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's cooperation with investigation noted. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. concluding order affirming interim decision. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. On 24.02.2025, this Court while issuing notice passed the following order:
2. In the meantime, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner, subject to his co operating with the investigation/trial.”
4. Thereafter, counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondent – State. In paragraph No.8 of the counter-affidavit, it is stated that following the order passed by this Court, appellant had joined investigation on 27.02.2025.
5. In view thereof, we make the interim order dated 24.02.2025 absolute subject to appellant continuing cooperating with the investigation.
6. Criminal Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
The court ruled that interim protection from coercive action is permissible when the appellant cooperates with the investigation, ensuring adherence to the procedural rights established under the Cri....
The court ruled that a directive allowing charge-sheets against accused under non-coercive orders is illegal, emphasizing the need for compliance with court orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
