SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1029

SANJAY KAROL, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Vinay Rajashekharappa Kulkarni – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legal basis for challenging bail order (Para 2 , 3 , 11)
2. factual background of the criminal case (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
3. arguments presented by parties regarding bail cancellation (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 16)
4. judicial authority on reviewing bail conditions (Para 14 , 15 , 17)
5. cancellation of bail and trial continuity (Para 19 , 20 , 21)

ORDER :

2. By way of the instant appeal, the State of Karnataka through the Central Bureau of Investigation (the “CBI”) has sought to assail the correctness of the order dated 25.04.2025 passed by the Learned LXXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-82) (the “Trial Court”) in Spl. C.C. No. 565 of 2021 (the “Impugned Order”) in relation to CBI’s application filed under Section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the “CrPC”) read with Section 483 (3) of the Bharitya Nagarik Surakha Sanhita, 2023 (the “ BNSS ”) seeking cancellation of bail granted to (i) Chandrashekhar Indi @ Chandu Mama; and (ii) the Respondent herein (the “Subject Application”).

4. Shorn of unnecessary detail(s) - the underlying FIR bearing number 135 of 2016 came to be registered at PS Dharwad Sub-Urban under Section 302 / 143 /147 /148 /

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top