SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1130

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Gajanan Dattatray Gore – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rathod Rajesh Ranjit, Advocate

Table of Content
1. summary of appeal and bail context. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's observations on the misuse of court trust and bail conditions. (Para 8 , 18)
3. conditions attached to bail and violations thereof. (Para 10 , 12 , 13)
4. arguments regarding compliance with bail conditions. (Para 11)
5. bail conditions should not be onerous or recovery-based. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 20)
6. prohibition on conditional bail based on financial undertakings. (Para 23 , 24)
7. dismissal of appeal with cost imposed. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

ORDER :

J.B. PARDIWALA, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 1-7-2025 below interim application No.4524/2024 filed in Criminal Bail Application No.445/2024, by which the interim application filed by the original complainant (Respondent No.2 – herein) came to be allowed and the order of bail passed by the High Court in favour of the appellant – herein dated 1-4-2024 came to be modified.

3. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be summarized as under:-

4. The appellant – herein came to be arrested in connection with Crime No.652 of 2023 dated 27-8-2023 registered with the Satara City

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top