SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1130

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Gajanan Dattatray Gore – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rathod Rajesh Ranjit, Advocate

Table of Content
1. summary of appeal and bail context. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's observations on the misuse of court trust and bail conditions. (Para 8 , 18)
3. conditions attached to bail and violations thereof. (Para 10 , 12 , 13)
4. arguments regarding compliance with bail conditions. (Para 11)
5. bail conditions should not be onerous or recovery-based. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 20)
6. prohibition on conditional bail based on financial undertakings. (Para 23 , 24)
7. dismissal of appeal with cost imposed. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

3. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be summarized as under:-

5. The appellant – herein was arrested on 17-8-2023.

    “1. Heard learned counsel Shri Kadam appearing for the applicant, learned counsel Shri Gole appearing for the Intervener and learned APP for the State.

    2. Learned counsel Shri Gole appearing for the intervener and learned APP vehemently opposed the application.

    3. This is an application for bail in respect of the offence punishable under Sections 406 , 408, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 34 INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 registered on 27/08/2023 vide C.R. No. 1-652 of 2023 with Satara City Police Station. The applicant was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top