SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1189

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ.
Time City Infrastructure And Housing Limited Lucknow – Petitioner
Versus
The State of U.P. & Ors. – Respondents
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 21747 of 2025
Decided On : 11-08-2025

Advocates aooeared:
For the Petitioner: Shantanu Krishna, Adv.

Ex parte injunctions must comply with mandatory procedural requirements, including giving notice to the opposing party. Non-compliance mandates vacating the injunction.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 39 Rule 3 - Injunction - Ex parte injunctions necessitate notice to the opposite party unless circumstances warrant otherwise - Non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements will result in vacating the injunction order - High Court’s supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 was invoked to set aside ex parte injunction granted by trial court, finding the plaintiff's claims lacking a prima facie case and adequacy of judicial reasoning. (Paras 2-8)

(B) Injunction - Requirements - The court must record reasons for granting ex parte injunctions and ensure compliance with procedural mandates to uphold the sanctity of legal processes. Failure to do so renders injunction orders invalid. (Paras 6-7)

(C) Transfer of Suit - Directions for transferring the case for fresh consideration by another court highlight the necessity of faithful adherence to legal principles in the injunction process. (Paras 32-34)

Table of Content
1. background of property ownership dispute. (Para 1)
2. challenge to the trial court's order. (Para 2)
3. advocacy by the petitioner. (Para 3)
4. requirements for granting ex parte injunction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
5. trial court to decide injunction on merits. (Para 8)
6. disposal of the special leave petition. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER :

1. This petition arises from the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Bench Lucknow) dated 24-7-2025 in Writ- C No.6701/2025 by which the petition filed by the respondents – herein (original defendants) came to be allowed thereby set asiding the order passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) granting ex parte injunction as prayed for by the petitioner – herein in Civil Suit No.447/2025. The Trial Court passed the following order dated 9-5-2025 while granting ex parte injunction in favour of the petitioner – herein (original plaintiff):-

“Heard on the arguments of the Ld.Counsel for the plaintiff on the Application C-6 with affidavit C-7 of the plaintiff on ad interim Injunction.

The plaintiff has filed the Extract of Khatoni of Year 1425- 1430 C-11/1 Ta 10 at serial no.C-10, Certified copy of Agreement to Sell Dated.21.03.2015 at serial no. C-12/1 Ta 11, Certified Copy of the Sale Deed Dated 30.04.2025 at serial no. C-13/1 Ta 11 in support of their prayer in the suit.

It is the stated by the Counsel for the plaintiff that on 21.06.2015, after the full and final payment Rs.3,60,12,782/- (Rupees Three Crores Sixty Lakhs Twelve Thousand Seven Hundred and Eighty-Two Only) to the defendant No.1 as Sale Consideration, the defendant No.1 had handed over the peaceful physical possession of the land to the plaintiff. After the physical possession of the Suit Land, the plaintiff had merged the said plot of land in its adjoining plotting sites and invested huge funds in terms of lacs and lacs of rupees to and Eighty-Two Only) to the defendant No.1 as Sale Consideration, the defendant No.1 had handed over the peaceful physical possession of the land to the plaintiff. After the physical possession of the Suit Land, the plaintiff had merged the said plot of land in its adjoining plotting sites and invested huge funds in terms of lacs and lacs of rupees to develop that suit land into plotting for sale. The plaintiff company had also developed the suit land with good roads and also constructed 02(two) offices on the same. The plaintiff company had been in with continuous physical possession of the said suit property till date.

The plaintiff has prayed for specific relief against the defendants on the suit property/land bearing Gata/Land No.452/1 Rakba 0.057 Hectre, Gata/Land No.607 Rakba 0.300 Hectre, Gata/Land No.615 Rakba 0.162 Hectre, Gata/Land No.616 Rakba 0.162 Hectre Gata/Land No.634 Rakba 0.304 Hectre with a Total Area of 5 Kita Rakba 0.985 Hectre, which is situated at Village-Kurouli, Pargana & Tehsil-Nawabganj, Dist- Barbanki. Thus, prima facie the case is made out by the plaintiff. In the light of the facts and circumstances and for the protection of the suit property/land and in order to prevent further litigation, Parties should maintain the status quo in the interest of justice.

ORDER

Parties are directed to maintain status quo on the title and possession of the suit property/ land bearing Gata/Land No.452/1 Rakba 0.057 Hectre, Gata/Land No.607 Rakba 0.300 Hectre, Gata/Land No.615 Rakba 0.162 Hectre, Gata/Land No.616 Rakba 0.162 Hectre Gata/Land No.634 Rakba 0.304 Hectre with a Total Area of 5 Kita Rakba 0.985 Hectre, which is situated at Village-Kurouli, Pargana Tehsil-Nawabganj, Dist- Barbanki. till the next date of hearing and parties are also directed not to sell the suit property/land till the next date of hearing.

Put up for further proceedings on 29.05.2025 for the disposal of Application No. C-6, Accordingly notice be issued to the defendants for the next date of hearing. This order will be binding on the parties those who are made parties in the present suit. This

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top