SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1331

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA AND R. MAHADEVAN, JJ.
Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions – Appellant
Versus
M/S International Health Care Education And Research Institute – Respondent
Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 19528/2018 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-07-2017 in DBITA No. 533/2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur]
Decided on : 11-02-2025

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 11, and 12-AA - Registration of charitable trusts - Trust registered under the Indian Trusts Act but denied registration under Section 12-AA due to lack of evidence for charitable activities - High Court affirmed ITAT's decision favoring the trust, stating CIT cannot comment if no activities were undertaken. (Paras 3-7, 10-15)

(B) Genuineness of activities - Trust must provide cogent evidence of charitable activities to obtain registration and consequent exemptions; mere registration does not ensure entitlement to exemptions under Sections 10 and 11. (Paras 15)

(C) Interpretation by the Court - The court recognized the requirement for genuine activities by the trust and that a Trust’s registration is subject to verification of said activities. (Paras 4, 14)

(D) Role of the Revenue - The burden of proof lies with the Revenue to disprove the genuineness of activities claimed by the trust. (Paras 11, 15)

Facts of the case:
The trust applied for registration under Section 12-AA but was initially rejected as it had not demonstrated charitable activities; subsequently, the ITAT directed the CIT to issue registration which was upheld by the High Court.

Findings of Court:
The revenue failed to provide sufficient evidence that the applicant trust was not engaged in genuine charitable activities during the relevant period.

Issues: Whether the activities performed by the trust were genuine and if the Commissioner could question the genuineness of activities when no activities had been documented prior to registration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that registration under Section 12-AA is not automatically indicative of entitlement, emphasizing that the trust must have documented and genuine charitable activities.

Result: The petition was dismissed in favor of the trust.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for charitable trust registration (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
2. tribunal reversed cit's decision (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. call for relook of ananda social precedent (Para 9 , 10)
4. need for genuine charitable activities (Para 11 , 12)
5. registration does not guarantee exemption (Para 13 , 15 , 16)

ORDER

1. Delay condoned.

2. This petition arises from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur dated 18th July, 2017 in DB Income tax Appeal No. 533 of 2009 by which the appeal filed by the Revenue came to be dismissed thereby affirming the judgment and order passed by the ITAT answering the question of law in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

3. The short point that falls for our consideration in the present petition is relating to the true and correct interpretation of Section 12-AA of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (for short the "Act 1961").

4. The respondent herein assessee claims to be a charitable trust engaged in activities like education, medical aid etc. It is not in dispute that the trust has been registered under the Indian Trusts, 1882 Act. However, for the purpose of claiming exemption under Sections 10 and 11 respectively of the Act, 1961 they applied for being registered under Section 12-AA of the Act, 1961.

5. It appears that the registration was declined by the Commissioner on the ground that there was nothing on record to indicate that the Trust was undertaking any charitable activities. Being dissatisfied with the order passed by the Commissioner declining registration under Section 12-AA of the Act, 1961, the assessee went before the Appellate Tribunal, The Tribunal allowed the appeal observing as under:-

"3. We have heard the parties. The brief facts of the case as appearing from the order of the Id. CIT are as under:-

"The above said trust was created on 01.01.2008. It filed an application in Form No. 10A on 18.02.2008 seeking registration under section 12A(a) of the I.T. Act, 1961.

On perusal of the documents filed by the trust along with its application, it is observed that the trust tiled a copy of the trust deed along with its application for registration instead of the original trust deed as is required under Rule 17A(a) of the Income-tax Rules, 1961. No reason for not filing the original trust deed has been given.

An opportunity of being heard was afforded by this office for 14.08.2008 & 27.08.2008 vide this office letter no. CIT/ITO(Tech.)/Alwar/2008-09/999 & 1379 dated 01.08.2008 & 25.08.2008 respectively, requiring to furnish the details of Income & Expenditure account along with notes on activities carried out by the trust from its inception. On the fixed date, Shri J.N. Goyal, Secretary of the trust appeared on 14.08.2008 and later on Shri Rajeev Goyal, Advocate attended on 27.08.2008. Shri J.N. Goyal filed a written submission that the trust is a new one so past three years accounts are not available. It was submitted that corpus fund has not been utilized. Donation of Rs. 25,000/- was given by Shri J.N.Goyal himself for which no receipt was issued by the trust. The office rent was paid to Rajiv Goyal for which no receipt was obtained. Scholarship and books were given to poor students for which no evidences were provided. Medical and were given to poor people for which neither medical bills or details of persons (beneficiaries) were available. Shri Rajeev Goyal. who attended the proceedings on 27.02.2008 also not provided any supporting evidences.

A trust is required to fulfil the following two conditions for getting itself registered under section 12A(a) of the Act:

(a) The objects of the trust/ institution should be charitable in nature.

(b) The activities of the trust/ institution should be genuine.

The above requirements are mandatory in nature for granting registration to a trust/ institution under section 12A(a). It is, however, observed that activities claimed to be carried out by the assessee are not verifiable till now from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top