SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1411

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, PANKAJ MITHAL
New india assurance co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Sakharam Baing – Respondent


Table of Content
1. insurance company's rights in claim petitions. (Para 3 , 4)
2. permitting insurers to contest claims and required permissions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. conclusion and remand for fresh decision. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. The sole issue which has been raised in these appeals is whether the Insurance Company who has been voluntarily impleaded by the claimants in the claim petition is entitled to raise all grounds to oppose the claim petition rather than confining to the grounds referred to under Section 149(2) of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988[For short 'the Act'].

4. The High Court has dismissed the appeal of the Insurance Company only on the ground that it had not taken permission under Section 170 of the Act and, therefore, it is not open to it to contest the matter on merits.

5. The issue which has been raised herein appears to be fully covered by the 3-Judges' Bench decision of this Court in United India Insurance Company Limited vs. Shila Datta and Ors. , (2011) 10 SCC 509

6. In paragraph 19 of the aforesaid citation, it has been clearly laid down that where the insurer is a party-respondent, either on a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top