SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1485

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Sagar Gorakh Chothve – Appellant
Versus
Vilas Eknath Kadam – Respondent


Table of Content
1. eviction due to non-payment of rent. (Para 1)
2. conditions for eviction under section 12 of the act. (Para 2)
3. time granted to vacate after judgment. (Para 3 , 4)
4. permitted increase includes education cess. (Para 5)
5. high court's decision is upheld. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
6. pending applications are resolved. (Para 9)

ORDER :

2. In paras 17 and 18 respectively of the impugned judgment, the High Court has observed thus:-

3. The High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners herein thereby affirming the judgment and decree passed by the courts below.

5. As rightly observed by the High Court, the issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Raju Kakara Shetty v. Ramesh Prataprao Shirole and Another reported in (1991) 1 SCC 570, wherein this Court has observed as under:

6. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and having gone through the materials on record, we are of the view that no error not to speak of any error of law could be said to have been committed by the High Court in passing the impugned order.

8. The petition is dismissed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top