Back
M. M. SUNDRESH, RAJESH BINDAL
Ashish Kakkar – Appellant
Versus
UT Of Chandigarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's arrest details. (Para 2) |
| 2. grounds for challenging arrest. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. non-compliance with arrest protocols. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. judicial reasoning for setting aside judgment. (Para 7) |
| 5. outcome of the appeal. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant was arrested on 30.12.2024 in connection with FIR No. 33/2022 registered under Sections 384 , 420, 468, 471, 509 and 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 and remanded to police custody for a period of 3 days.
3. Vide the present appeal, the appellant has challenged both his arrest and the remand order dated 30.12.2024 on three grounds, namely, there is a clear non-compliance of the mandate under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'); the appellant was not heard at the time of remand and the grounds of arrest as mandated under Section 50 of the Code have not been furnished to the appellant as against the mere arrest memo.
4. We are inclined to consider only the last issue raised by the appellant with respect to the non-furnishing of the grounds of arrest.
5. Upon perusing annexure P-3, we can see that what has been provided to the appellant is
Non-compliance with Article 22(1) and Section 50 Cr.P.C. vitiates arrest and remand, necessitating communication of grounds for arrest and provision of legal aid.
The court emphasizes the necessity of compliance with Sections 41, 41A, and 50 of the Cr.P.C. regarding arrest procedures, highlighting the fundamental rights of individuals under Articles 21 and 22 ....
The requirement to inform an arrested person of the grounds for arrest is fundamental; however, substantial compliance may be sufficient, and procedural defects can be curable without rendering deten....
The failure to communicate the grounds of arrest in writing does not render detention illegal if substantial compliance with constitutional and statutory mandates is demonstrated.
The failure to communicate the grounds of arrest to the accused constitutes a violation of constitutional rights, rendering the arrest and subsequent remand illegal.
Communication of grounds of arrest must be meaningful, ensuring awareness of factual basis for effective legal representation; strict adherence to formalism is not required if substance is achieved.
The court reaffirmed that informing an arrested person of the grounds for arrest is a constitutional requirement, and non-compliance invalidates the arrest and remand.
The requirement to communicate grounds of arrest under Article 22(1) is satisfied when essential allegations are conveyed effectively, ensuring the accused's understanding and ability to prepare a de....
The failure to communicate the grounds of arrest as required by law renders the arrest illegal, violating constitutional rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
