SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1610

N. KOTISWAR SINGH, SURYA KANT
Rama Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. context of the case and initial allegations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. procedural history of summons application under cr.p.c. (Para 7 , 8)
3. supplementary report findings on absence of evidence. (Para 9 , 10)
4. arguments on maintainability of appeal and distinction of roles. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. importance of evidence for invoking section 319 of cr.p.c. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. court's directive on the trial court's responsibilities. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
7. procedural orders for trial court appearance. (Para 24 , 25)

ORDER :

2. Heard learned senior counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. As per the allegations contained in the FIR, on 11.03.2014 at about 4.30 p.m., the complainant and his associates, including Bharat Kumar Tiwari, Ram Milan @ Chainu, Pradeep Kumar and Lakhan Lal Tiwari together went to the fields situated at Basani area at Pahreta Mauza. The farmhouse of one of the accused Raju Singh @ Avnendra Singh (who is husband of the appellant) is also there in those fields, where the said Raju Singh @ Avnendra Singh, the appellant, Raghvendra Singh, Ram Singh and one unknown person were sitting on the roof. One person was armed with DBBL Gun an

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top