SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1637

ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Kamal @ Kamal Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant's incarceration details and bail history. (Para 3 , 4)
2. high court's dismissal of the bail application. (Para 5)
3. court's reasoning for granting bail. (Para 6)
4. final order and direction for bail grant. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)

ORDER :

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

4. The first application for bail filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Sessions Court on 7th February, 2023. The High Court also dismissed the bail application filed by the appellant. On 19th May, 2023, a special leave petition filed by the appellant was dismissed as withdrawn. Instead of filing a fresh application before the Sessions Court, a second special leave petition was filed against the same order of the High Court which was dismissed by an order dated 14th August, 2024.

6. We fail to understand the reasoning adopted by the High Court. Even if an earlier bail application is rejected, an accused can make a fresh application at a subsequent stage on the ground of material change in circumstances. Therefore, it was the duty of the High Court to consider the bail application on merits. However, that has not been done. After the first bail application was rejected,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top