B. R. GAVAI, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Raghav Prashad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R. GAVAI, CJI.
FACTUAL ASPECTS
1. The present appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 4th July 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad1 [Hereinafter referred to as “the High Court”] in Criminal Appeal u/s 374 Cr.P.C. No. 2259 of 1989 filed by the accused appellants whereby, the High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment and order dated 8th November 1989 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karvi (Banda)2 [Hereinafter referred to as “the Trial Court”] in Sessions Case No. 88 of 1986 convicting the accused appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.3 [Hereinafter referred to as “IPC”] The High Court also upheld the order of sentence dated 15th November, 1989 vide which the Trial Court had sentenced the accused appellants to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs. 6,000/-.
2. Shorn of details, the facts leading to the present appeal are as under:
Murder – Unintentional homicide is not murder under Section 302 of IPC.
(1) Unintentional homicide is not murder under Section 302 of IPC.(2) Merely because witnesses are relatives, cannot be a ground to discard testimony of such witnesses – Only requirement is that test....
Murder and hurt – Merely because witnesses are relatives of deceased and as such are interested witnesses that alone cannot be a ground to discard their testimony – Only requirement is that testimony....
The court clarified that absence of premeditation and intent in a sudden quarrel may shift the charge from murder to culpable homicide.
Unintentional homicide committed in a sudden fight in heat of passion, upon a sudden quarrel, is punishable under Part-I of Section 304 IPC.
The judgment established the importance of medical evidence and legal precedents in determining the nature of injuries and the applicability of relevant sections of the IPC.
(1) It is possible to form a common intention just before or during occurrence.(2) When evidence of eyewitnesses is of sterling quality, adverse inference need not be drawn – Quality is more importan....
Homicide committed in a sudden fight, in heat of passion and upon a sudden quarrel, is not murder under Section 302 of IPC.
Murder – Unintentional homicide is not murder under Section 302 of IPC (Section 103(1) of BNS, 2023).
The court confirmed that impulsive assaults leading to death constitute culpable homicide under Section 304(II) IPC, emphasizing the importance of eyewitness testimony in establishing guilt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.