SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1859

VIKRAM NATH, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Mahender Pal Chabra – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Aggrawal – Respondent


Table of Content
1. final directions and expeditious decision requested (Para 1 , 2 , 13 , 14 , 15)
2. failure to consider evidence in first appeal (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. improper dismissal of appeal by high court (Para 6 , 8)
4. requirements for dismissals under order xli rule 11 (Para 7 , 9 , 11)
5. appellate court's obligation for reasoned judgment (Para 10)
6. direct confirmation of trial court's judgment (Para 12)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal deserves to be allowed on a short point that the Division Bench of the High Court, while deciding the First Appeal, has failed to take into consideration the parameters applicable for deciding a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081[In short, “CPC”].

3. Appellant herein is the defendant in a suit for specific performance instituted by the respondent. Trial Court decreed the suit by an elaborate judgment dealing with the evidence on record. Aggrieved the appellant herein preferred an appeal under section 96 CPC. The First Appeal was dismissed by the High Court vide impugned judgment giving rise to the present appeal.

4. Briefly stated there was an agreement to sell to purchase a piece of land and building at A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top