Rambali Sahni vs State of Bihar - 2026 Supreme(SC) 75

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(SC) 75

ARAVIND KUMAR, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Rambali Sahni – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Namit Saxena, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR Ms. Ekta Kundu, Adv.

ORDER

1. Heard.

2. Delay condoned.

3. Leave granted.

4. FIR No.287/2024 was registered on 23.10.2024. It is the case of the prosecution that on receipt of the secret information, Mr. Dhawan Kumar would proceed towards Imadpur on his Honda motorcycle carrying Ganja, the said vehicle was intercepted by putting up the barricade and the said vehicle was seized and Mr. Dhawan Kumar was apprehended and from his conscious possession, 6.330 kg of Ganja was seized. On inquiry, he had stated that his father had given it to him for being delivered to the appellant herein. As such based on the statement of Mr. Dhawan Kumar, the appellant is arraigned as an accused.

5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we notice that initially the jurisdictional High Court had granted bail on 27.08.2025 (Annexure-P/3) to appellant herein. However, by the impugned order, the same was reversed or recalled on the premise that Court Master though had recorded as petition having been rejected in the operative portion had mistakenly written as “allowed”. The High Court also noted in the impugned order that the Personal Assistant when visited with a show-cause notice had tendered unqualified apolo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document