Back
ARAVIND KUMAR, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard.
2. Leave granted.
3. The Order dated 14.11.2025 passed in CRM-M-56737 of 2025 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana adjourning the proceedings is under challenge. These proceedings relates to the dishonour of a cheque resulting in conviction of the appellant – accused which is now pending in appeal CRA No.956/2017 wherein the prayer for suspension of sentence initially granted and released on bail which order though extended from time to time came to be rejected. Hence, aforestated revision petition has been filed and it has been adjourned from time to time. Hence this appeal. While issuing notice to the respondents on 27.11.2025, this Court had passed the following order: -
3. The genesis of this case relates to proceedings initiated by the second respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (NI Act) for the alleged return of the two ch
Suspension of sentence and release on bail – Directing accused to be present before Appellate Court or Revisional Court would not be warranted particularly after order for suspension of sentence has ....
Suspension of sentence under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. maintainable in appeal for bailable NI Act offence despite no trial court order under 389(3).
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
