J. B. PARDIWALA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Sanand Properties P. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jt. Commr. of I. T. Range – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:
| INDEX | ||
| A. | FACTUAL MATRIX | |
|
| (i) (ii) (iii) | The Impugned Order in Civil Appeal No. 744 of 2013 The Impugned Order in Civil Appeal No. 9107 of 2012 The Impugned Order in Civil Appeal 19487 of 2017 |
| B. | SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PARTIES | |
|
| (i) (ii) | Submissions on behalf of the Assessee Submissions on behalf of the Revenue |
| C. | ISSUES TO BE DETERMINED | |
| D. | ANALYSIS | |
|
| (i)
(ii) | Whether the reopening of assessments of the SPPL for the AY 2007-08 and the AY 2008-09, respectively, were valid? (a) Statutory Framework Governing Reassessment under Section 147 and Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961 respectively (b) Meaning and scope of “reason to believe” under Section 147 of the IT Act, 1961 (c) Whether the Assessing Officer had any tangible material or were the reopening of assessments on mere change of opinion? Whether the amount accrued to the SPPL from the AOP, based on Clause 7 of the AOP Agreeme |
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. Kelvinator of India Limited, (2010) 320 ITR 561 [Paras 16
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers P. Ltd.
Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer, Companies District I Calcutta and Anr.
M/s Phool Chand Bajrang Lal and Another v. Income Tax Officer and Another
GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO
Sir Chunilal V. Mehta and Sons Ltd. v. Century Spinning. & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City II, Bombay v. Shri Sitaldas Tirathdas, Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.