SANJAY KUMAR, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Hirani Developers – Appellant
Versus
Nehru Nagar Samruddhi CHS Ltd. and another Etc. – Respondent
What is the effect of incorporating an arbitration clause from a prior document into a later contract by reference under Section 7(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
Key Points: - The appellant, Hirani Developers, entered into a Development Agreement with the respondent society on 20.12.2011, which included an arbitration clause (Clause 36) (!) . - The appellant subsequently entered into Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with individual respondent members, which included a clause (Clause 14) stating that all terms and conditions of the Development Agreement were to be construed as part of the new agreements and binding on the parties (!) . - The High Court had previously dismissed the appellant's Section 11 applications, ruling that there was no arbitration agreement because the individual members were not privy to the original Development Agreement (!) . - The Supreme Court held that Clause 14 of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements demonstrated a clear intention to incorporate the Development Agreement in its entirety, including the arbitration clause (!) (!) . - The Supreme Court clarified that under Section 7(5) of the Arbitration Act, an arbitration clause in another document is incorporated into a later contract if the reference indicates an intention to make that clause part of the contract (!) (!) . - The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeals (!) . - Mr. Vishal Kanade, Advocate, Bombay High Court, was appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the appellant and the respondent members (!) .
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR, J
1. Leave granted.
2. Existence of an arbitration agreement is in dispute.
3. By common order dated 26.06.2025, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay held that there was no such arbitration agreement between the parties and dismissed the five applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 1 [For short, ‘the Arbitration Act’], by the appellant, Hirani Developers, seeking appointment of an arbitrator.
4. Hirani Developers, the appellant, a proprietary concern involved in real estate business, entered into a Development Agreement on 20.12.2011, registered as Document No. BDR13-05469-2012 on 04.07.2012, with Nehru Nagar Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Limited, respondent No. 1, for redevelopment of its project which was in a dilapidated condition. The Development Agreement provided for a dispute resolution mechanism in Clause 36, which reads as under: -
5. Long ther
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.