SANJAY KAROL, N. KOTISWAR SINGH
Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike – Appellant
Versus
K. K. Umesh Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
Leave Granted.
2. The issue for our consideration is whether the appellant can be held liable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the injuries sustained by respondent no.1 that were caused due to the falling of a roadside tree on the vehicle by which the respondent no.1 was travelling, but had stopped under the tree waiting for the rain to subside and then proceed further.
3. The facts in which this question arose are as follows:
Respondent no.1 was travelling on 23rd June 2007 in an auto from Queens Road to Chinnaswamy Stadium when due to heavy rain it was requested by respondent no.1 that the vehicle be pulled up to the side of the road. Along the road were older trees, some even as old as hundred years and when the vehicle was stationary underneath one of these trees, a branch got detached from the tree fell on top, injuring the respondent. Thereafter, he was admitted to Mallya Hospital and received treatment.
A claim petition1[MVC No.1313/2020] was filed before the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Bangalore, seeking compensation of Rs.50 lakhs. The Claims Tribunal in terms of order dated 10th April 2013 dismissed the claim on account of it being a natura
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.